You just do you, umma do me.
These electronics are giving me a headache. They still are not working for me (but they work for the engineer). I soldered up 4 upgrades and they all do the same thing (nothing, everything blinks and works and nothing smokes but still no ON/OFF when it is all connected up). So I've emailed the engineer a panic letter and schematic to see what I am doing wrong. I have 15 electronics sitting here in front of me waiting for the upgrade and 5 need to ship out immediatly. I'm trying not to stress out, but I am.
I have the intake ionizers on the new air filter housing and they are ready for the road. Below is a picture of them in the day time and below that is a video of them at night (so you can see the UV ionizer light).
Video of the inoizers at night (CLICK HERE).
The cell tank has been painted white on the inside and is ready for some flashing red LEDs.
The spacers are about ready also. The company who made them wanted $1,250.00 for an order count of 500 ($2.50 each). I can't do that. So I've had my dad send me our old family pecan cracker (nut press). It is an ajustable steel press basically. I've talked to the machinest and he said he can make a die that I can put in the nut cracker so I can press out the spacer from a regular nylon washer. This way I can make mine and some for yall too.
Gas is over 4$ a gallon here. I got the truck vynils a few days ago and they look great. I fucked up 2 of them because the wind decided to blow real hard and got dirt on the sticky side. Chris was nice enough to cut me a few more for the Dodge. But all in all I think it is ready for the media circus. I drove it around today for a few minutes since it never gets any road time. Lots of new people asking about boosters (I DON'T DO BOOSTERS) and when I'm going to be finsihed. Subscribe to the blog because when I finish I'll post it here.
Left to do:
Get the fucking electronics to pulse the rewied alterantor right
Setup pulsing red LEDs in cell tank
make spacers and setup big 40 tube Dodge cell
get the new wound stator for the rewired alternator and test
get resonance
drive away
wishing you the best and I like your updates.
Reply to this
Hey Kevin.....
still can't get the signal generator to pulse the alternator.... How long are the wire leads (and size of wire... and type of strands etc) do you have between the generator and the alternator... the wires have resistance and I think I read they can also act like an inductor... I just wonder if this could be part of the problem... example... the system works fine with 10" long leads between the generator and the alternator... now increase the length of the leads to 1000 feet.... would the system still work the same??? just food for thought..
Also if you run the wiring next to a strong electrical magnetic field... such as an ignition coil the signal can be distorted by the magnetic field.... could be part of the problem if the signal is sensitive to EMF... Hey I'm no expert but it could be something really simple that you are overlooking.
Kevin wrote " nope. it isn't anything I can find. Everything is wired up right. I'm just going to go with the SCR."
Reply to this
I am working on a honda civic hybrid to run off of HHO thru electrolosis. I bought a watercarpro guide. I thought we might be able to compare notes. I'm meeting with a guy that specializes in circuit boards to build me a square wave signal pulse generator. I believe this will act as a on-demand electrolsis generator. I have scematics for the generator. it looks like I'm going to tap into the wires for my throttle position sensor to adjust the frequency of the generator from 8KHz to 265KHz. This guide calls for a high pressure water pump (75psi) to pressurize the system. But I still haven't figured out how I'm going to hook my hydrogen line into the exsisting fuel system. the guide calls for a beam-garretson adapter to hook into the fuel system. But if I pressureize the electrolosis system, how will it not pump H2O straight into the engine? I'm still in the early stages of development right now and still ordering parts. But I wanted to let you know I am a machinist and hope to make most of the major stainless parts. Maybe I can help you out. I'd like to get your input on where I stand.
Kevin wrote " send me an email dude. Also buy a CD or DVD and review everything Stan Meyer was doing."
Reply to this
I had a question as to how you've solved the issue with energy input vs. output. The way I see it, it is a simple equation:
H2O + energy1 = browns gas + losses1 = H20 + energy2 + losses2 + losses1.
Therefore, energy1 = energy2 + losses2 + losses1. energy1 > energy2.
Considering energy cannot be created nor destroyed, and there are losses in every chemical and mechanical system, how can your output of energy possibly be higher than your input?
Thanks for the answer.
Kevin wrote " that sure is a fancy way of saying you haven't read a fucking thing about what Stan was doing or I am doing. Thanks for being so simple minded and trying to equate this to some shit in your cookie-cutter text book. My answer is buy a CD or DVD and read ."
Reply to this
Kevin--
Was just curious if you could provide a simple answer to his question, as it is pretty important. I haven't had the time (work 3 jobs) to get a CD or DVD and look into this yet, and it's something that I've been wondering as well (and I have read all of your blog posts and site information). Maybe it just slipped my mind when I was reading, but if you could clarify this, I'd really appreciate it.
Kevin wrote " I'm not going to read to you like a little kid bro. That is why it is already written in a Book, so you can read it. This has nothing to do with Brown's gas. Here is a great idea, why don't I rewrite the whole book word for word and post it in my blog.....NOOOOOOOO ...because I didn't write the book to begin with. I had to read it just like you do. So put down the fucking college version of "how to be a sheep" and pick up the Stan Meyer book called The Birth of a New Technology. You're not going to believe what I say anyways, so read it for yourself. If you don't, and you keep referring back to the Sheep Handbook, you're going to keep working those three jobs dude. Break out."
Reply to this
Actually, I'm the last person that you would be calling a sheep if you knew me, so if you're a Christian man as you purport to be, then I'd suggest holding off on the "judging others" concept particularly when you have no idea who you're talking to. I don't doubt you or your technology and in fact spread this site around like the plague. I'm asking for your opinion because Stan Meyer has never actually produced a true working model of his patents and has been sued for inability to actually produce results. The dune buggy didn't show anything nor was it examined by a panel of independent scholars.
The jobs I work are things that I love to do. I have to pay back a massive loan that I took out for my college education on top of my regular expenses, and if I intend to eventually run for office on a limited government, Constitutional platform, then I'll need to get the money from somewhere.
So, I'll reiterate, I'm more interested in hearing what YOU have to say considering you're on the verge of doing something that Stan hasn't visibly demonstrated to me in my research of him. Am I doubting him? No, but Stan is dead, and for whatever weird reason his brother refuses to return your calls. This is your calling, not mine. I have my long-term goals, and ideas of how I can make a difference for as many Americans as possible, as well as a blueprint of how to get there.
It's your right to not answer my question or even post my comment, but this whole situation is ridiculous. If you were an expert on the Bible and I asked you what did Jesus turn water into, would you tell me to read the whole book and find out for myself? I'm just asking for a basic paragraph summary so that when people that I tell about this site ask me the same question I'm asking you, I can give them a quick response rather than struggle with the answer.
Good luck, and as always, I'll continue to support you.
Kevin wrote "First off.... I am a Christian, but I'm not your normal pussyass minister preaching love and feeding the fat people on Wednesday nights Christian (no offense). I'm a Crusader Christian. I'm the first to rise and the first to fall. I judge the front line with a battle cry and a thrust of my sword. That's the difference between a "Wednesday night christian" and a crass crusader. I'm sorta like a Sam Kinison kinda christian.
Now for the taming of the Lion.
Stan DID produce a working model or most of the videos I have wouldn't exist. The patent office forced him to demonstrate it to them and he mentions that in one of his videos. The Pentagon sent a Lt Colonel to visit him... so did that really happen? I wasn't there, neither was the skeptic. Call the PTO and find the examiner, his name is on all the patents.
Stan was sued in a civil court, not a criminal court, and the lawsuit was bogus as fuck. You can read all the info right here. And if anyone sides with the court in this case I'll run them over with my water powered Dodge.
Oh, and it is your calling dude. I know it is your calling or your wouldn't be trying to explain it to people or give a shit about spreading my web site around. And I must give you props for doing a eat job even though you're in denial (it is your calling dude). We both know for a fact this is the opposite of a super WMD. In fact is it a super badass Weapon of Mass Improvement. And you want it like I do.
Jesus turned water into a solid path of enlightenment for all fishermen of the soul.... Mosses turned water into wine, that drunk bastard would change his staff into a snake when he got really crunk too. The Romans turned Jesus into a symbol and a martyr... And America has turned Jesus into an egg hiding rabbit, a big fat man who likes to give toys to kids, and these huge, beautiful places for tax shelters to worship the all mighty dollar.
I give up. How about a simple answer to give the skeptics...?
My favorite answer to all technical questions is "RTFM". But you wanted a paragraph.
This is my version of the 3 things Stan was doing in a nut shell.
1. Stan used an LRC circuit to attract the Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Nitrogen out of water. This is a voltage controlled method which relies on frequency, inductance, capacitance, and impedance. The amps consumed are very low as in most radio equipment. If you don't know Ham Radio or have a ARRL handbook all the physics degrees in the world wont help you. The LRC circuit is also known as a Tesla Resonator and sometimes called a tank circuit.
2. Stan Meyer stripped ions off electrons of atoms and molecules to induce a higher yield of energy than was used to originally strip the electrons. He used standard ionization/deionization methods to do this. Example is the Ionic Breeze air ionizer.
3. Stan recirculates the exhaust which is still stripped of ions. The recirculation of the steam/humidity that is created lowers the burn rate of the Hydrogen and raises the efficiency of the processes above.
Here is Stan's explanation of the process.
"The Hydrogen Fracturing Process dissaccoicates the water molecule by way of voltage stimulation, ionizes the combustible gases by electron ejection and, then, prevents the formation of the water molecule during thermal gas ignition... releasing thermal explosive energy beyond "normal" gas burning levels under control state... and the atomic energy process is environmentally safe."
There is a longer version in the first 20 pages of the The Birth of a New Technology, by Stan Meyer.
Stan Meyer's technique/method doesn't break any Laws or Physics or Laws of Thermodynamics. It is not over unity or perpetual motion. It does however show Faraday didn't use high voltage, high frequency, inductors, capacitors, or impedance to confirm ALL his "ideas" were correct. That is all Stan did is prove Faraday wasn't always right.
If Faraday knew Tesla, Tesla would have showed Faraday extraordinary events when using high voltage, high frequency, radio circuits, and Lines of Force.
I feel I am making such progress because of my hacker mentality, my interest in Tesla, my undying need to help people, and the opportunity to proudly say "yup, I can read directions, sometimes". The fundamentals of all this is the reading the directions part, and to do that the skeptic/PHD must realize is that half the problems with bad directions are bad reading/writing skills, not stupid people."
Reply to this
First off, I've been reading non-stop about Stan Meyer/using hydrogen from water as fuel for about the past 2 weeks. There are many many places on the internet to read and learn about this subject.
Also within the past day I have come so far as to realize that a gentleman from England (Mr. Lawton) had made a schematic for the electronics for the water cell. I said to myself "Hmm I wonder if there are PCB companies on the internet that will also assemble the board?" Turns out there are.
It also turns out that Kevin sells them, although it seems at the moment there are some technical issues. This was amazing to me as when I buy it it will have saved me a massive headache.
Now, the real reason I'm writing (since I've already stroked Kevin's ego hehe) is to answer John and Dan's question.
I couldn't answer your equation, cause I don't know anything about it. I can however answer the question of what seems to be to people who havn't read or understand that releasing hydrogen from water is seemingly over unity or a "key" of sorts to perpetual motion.
Both of those assumptions are false and incorrect. The reason they are incorrect is that YOU ARE NOT CREATING HYDROGEN. If you were your equation would be correct and so would overunity. What you ARE DOING is breaking the bond of the hydrogen and oxygen. Stan Meyer, with his invention, proved that this could be done with FAR LESS ENERGY than previously realized. Really there isn't anything amazing or unthinkable happening.
Usually it takes an outsider to the industry to discover things. In this case the industry is science and the outsider was Stan Meyer
One last thing: I've noticed that many websites having to do with waterfuel have been dormant, for a long time for example h2earth.org. Not to sound crazy but have the MIB visited these people?
Keep the good stuff coming Kevin, excellent work.
-Nelson
P.S. I've got a GED too.
Kevin wrote " I got army guns so MIB better come packing or sniping. People that are all talk seem to stand in one place, while people who have direction tend to move around more. The MIB is bullshit, but like Bigfoot, I'll kill one so I can prove they exist."
Reply to this